Tran v. Young et al

Filing 43

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/10/19 ADOPTING 41 Findings and Recommendations in full; and DENYING 40 Motion to Stay. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BINH C. TRAN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-1260 MCE DB P v. ORDER K. YOUNG, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 17 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his rights when they 19 failed to protect him, falsified documents, refused to call a requested witness during a disciplinary 20 hearing, and treated him differently than other inmates. The matter was referred to a United 21 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 On June 27, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 23 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 24 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 41) Plaintiff has not filed 25 objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 26 27 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 27, 2019, are ADOPTED in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion to stay (ECF No. 40) is DENIED. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: September 10, 2019 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?