Eastland v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/16/18: Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to inform the court re consent to Magistrate Ju dge jurisdiction, and for failure to file a dispositive motion, both as required by the court's scheduling order. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve on plaintiff a copy of the court's form entitled "Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment."(Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MATTHEW EASTLAND,
12
13
14
No. 2:17-CV-1261-CMK
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
15
Defendant.
16
/
17
18
Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action under
19
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security.
20
A review of the docket reflects that defendant has notified the court regarding consent to proceed
21
before a Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, however, has not notified the court regarding consent.
22
Pursuant to the court’s scheduling order and Eastern District of California Local Rules, Appendix
23
A, the time to do so has now expired. In addition, pursuant to the court’s scheduling order,
24
plaintiff is required to prosecute this action by either seeking voluntary remand or filing a
25
dispositive motion within 45 days from the date of service of the administrative record by
26
defendant. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action for
1
1
lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. A
2
review of the docket reflects that the answer and certified administrative record were served on
3
October 26, 2017. To date, plaintiff has not filed a dispositive motion.
4
Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why
5
this action should not be dismissed for failure to inform the court regarding consent to Magistrate
6
Judge jurisdiction, and for failure to file a dispositive motion, both as required by the court’s
7
scheduling order. Submission of a completed consent election form and dispositive motion shall
8
constitute a sufficient response. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve on plaintiff a copy of
9
the court’s form entitled “Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment.” Plaintiff is
10
warned that failure to respond to this order may result in the dismissal of the action for the
11
reasons discussed above, as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with court rules and
12
orders. See Local Rule 110.
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
17
DATED: January 16, 2018
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?