Campos-Rodriguez v. Jones et al
Filing
40
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/26/18 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to comply with the local rules and with court orders. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objection due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSE ARBOR CAMPOS -RODRIGUEZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-1269 JAM DB P
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
JONES, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
17
18
Plaintiff alleges defendants interfered with his legal mail when he was incarcerated at the South
19
Lake Tahoe Jail. In an order filed October 19, 2018, the court ordered plaintiff to provide the
20
court with his current address if he wished to maintain this action. (ECF No. 39.) The court
21
advised plaintiff that Local Rule 182(f) requires plaintiff to keep the court apprised of his current
22
address. Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to provide a current address within thirty days, this
23
court would recommend dismissal of this action.
The October 19 order was served on plaintiff at the address he provided. It was returned
24
25
to the court as undeliverable. Plaintiff has not provided an updated address or otherwise
26
responded to the court’s October 19 order.
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for
2
plaintiff’s failure to comply with the local rules and with court orders. See E.D. Cal. R. 110; Fed.
3
R. Civ. P. 41.
4
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge
5
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
6
after being served with these findings and recommendations, either party may file written
7
objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's
8
Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the
9
specified time may result in waiver of the right to appeal the district court’s order. Martinez v.
10
Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
11
Dated: November 26, 2018
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DLB:9
DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/camp1269.fr
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?