Tanksley v. Campa et al
Filing
9
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/31/2018 DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign a U.S. District Judge to this case. District Judge Troy L. Nunley assigned to this case. It is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Fabillaran, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MOODY WOODROW TANKSLEY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-01271 CKD P
v.
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
SHERIFF CAMPA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a Sacramento County inmate proceeding without counsel in this action brought
17
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 3, 2107, this court ordered plaintiff to file a completed
19
in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee within thirty days and plaintiff was cautioned
20
that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without
21
prejudice. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s
22
order.
23
24
25
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this
case to a district court judge.
IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
27
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
28
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
1
1
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
2
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
3
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
4
objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
5
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
6
appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
7
Dated: January 31, 2018
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
12/tank1271.fifp.docx
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?