Lawson v. Tehama County et al

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/31/2017 ORDERING The plaintiff shall certify in writing that he has reviewed and understands the rules for pro se use of electronic filing as described in this Order and present it to the Clerk of the Court; The Clerk of the Court shall thereafter accept an email address that will be used in electronic filing matters and PERMIT plaintiff to file using the ECF system. (Washington, S) Modified on 8/1/2017 (Washington, S).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 LEE LAWSON 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:17-cv-1276 TLN GGH v. ORDER TEHAMA COUNTY, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, appearing in pro se, seeks permission for leave to file through the e-filing system 16 17 of the court. Plaintiff must first prepare a statement showing that he has reviewed the terms and 18 conditions for such leave, as reflected in Eastern District of California Local Rules 100(f), 101 19 and 133(b)(2)-(3), which are available on line and in the Court Clerk’s office on the 4th Floor of 20 the courthouse at 501 I Street, Sacramento, California. 21 With the foregoing in mind, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT 22 1. The plaintiff shall certify in writing that he has reviewed and understands the rules 23 for pro se use of electronic filing as described in this Order and present it to the Clerk of the 24 Court; 2. 25 The Clerk of the Court shall thereafter accept an email address that will be used in 26 electronic filing matters and permit the plaintiff to thereafter file using the ECF system. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 3. Plaintiff is warned that unwarranted, voluminous filings and filings of unnecessary length will result in a withdrawal of plaintiff’s e-filing status. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 31, 2017 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?