Lawson v. Tehama County et al

Filing 14

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/7/2017 ORDERING All Defendants shall respond to 1 Complaint on or before 8/24/2017. If either or both of the responses are Motions to Dismiss plaintiff shall have 30 days from the receipt of the response to oppose the motion(s). (Washington, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LEE LAWSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:17-cv-1276 TLN GGH

v.

ORDER

TEHAMA COUNTY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff appears in this action in pro se. On August 1, 2017 this court entered an Order

18

extending the time for defendants to respond to the complaint to August 10, 2017, ECF No. 11,

19

pursuant to a stipulation among the parties filed on July 25, 2017. ECF No. 9. Upon review it is

20

clear that this extension was sought only by defendants Tehama County, Deputy Sheriff Buck

21

Squire, Deputy Sheriff Jerry Jungwirth, Tehama County Agents Keith Curl and Clinton Weston.

22

ECF No. 9.

23

It has come to the court’s attention that a second stipulation was entered on July 24, 2017,

24

seeking an extension of time until August 24, 2017 and executed by plaintiff and defendant Roger

25

Meyer.
In light of the foregoing, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

26
27
28

that:
1.

All Defendants shall respond to the Complaint on or before August 24, 2017.
1

1
2
3
4
5

2.

If either or both of the responses are Motions to Dismiss plaintiff shall have 30

days from the receipt of the response to oppose the motion(s).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 7, 2017
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2