Herrera v. Blandion

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 0818/17 vacating 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 5 Motion for Extension of time. Plaintiff is granted 60 days from the date of this order in which to file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the court's filing fee. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARMANDO HERRERA, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-1278 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER BLANDION, Defendant. 16 17 On August 14, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion for a ninety-day extension of time to file a 18 “request for reassignment of judge.” (ECF No. 5 at 1.) Appended to the request was plaintiff’s 19 declaration in which he states that on August 7, 2017, he met with his E.N.T. doctor, who told 20 plaintiff he was going to be sent to an outside hospital for testing because plaintiff is bleeding off 21 and on from his nose, and may again require surgery. Plaintiff claims it is difficult to get another 22 prisoner to help on legal documents. 23 Plaintiff does not explain why or on what basis he plans to request reassignment of judges. 24 The record reflects that the court has not yet screened plaintiff’s complaint because he has 25 not paid the court’s filing fee or filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was 26 provided the application form by order filed June 29, 2017. Plaintiff may avoid an order 27 dismissing his case by completing and filing the application to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 Because plaintiff is a state prisoner, he is not required to obtain prison officials’ certification on 1 the form; rather, the court will obtain plaintiff’s certified trust account statement directly from the 2 prison. Therefore, no legal research is required for plaintiff to complete, sign, and file the 3 application to proceed in forma pauperis. 4 Moreover, although plaintiff claims that he is going to be sent for testing and may have to 5 have surgery, he does not know when he will be hospitalized , if he will have to have surgery, and 6 if so, when the surgery might take place. 7 Plaintiff is required to diligently prosecute his case.1 The court cannot screen the 8 complaint until plaintiff pays the court’s filing fee or is granted leave to proceed in forma 9 pauperis. The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff another application to proceed in forma pauperis. 10 In an abundance of caution, the August 10, 2017 findings and recommendations are vacated, and 11 plaintiff is granted sixty days in which to file the completed application or pay the court’s filing 12 fee. In the meantime, if plaintiff’s medical situation changes, he may seek a further extension at 13 that time. On the other hand, plaintiff’s underlying pleading addresses defendant’s actions taken on 14 15 June 19, 2017. Plaintiff may wish to voluntarily dismiss this action and re-file it once his medical 16 issues have been resolved. 17 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 18 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 4) are vacated; 19 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a ninety day extension of time (ECF No. 5) is denied; 20 3. Plaintiff is granted sixty days from the date of this order in which to file a completed 21 application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the court’s filing fee; and 22 //// 23 //// 24 //// 25 //// 26 1 27 28 Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that if a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, “the court -- on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff -- must dismiss the action without prejudice or order service be made within a specified time.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 2 1 4. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 by a prisoner. 3 Dated: August 18, 2017 4 5 /herr1278.36 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?