Weaver v. Kendall
Filing
4
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/31/17 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge Garland E. Burrell randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILLIE WEAVER,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-1298 CKD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER AND
KENDALL,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendant.
16
17
By an order filed June 29, 2017, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma
18
pauperis application or pay the filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so
19
would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now
20
expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order.
21
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district
court judge to this case; and
23
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
24
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge
25
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
26
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
27
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and
28
Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time
1
1
may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th
2
Cir. 1991).
3
Dated: August 31, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
weav1298.fifp
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?