Jackson v. Martinez
Filing
32
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/15/2021 ADOPTING 31 Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 28 Motion for Immediate Release. (Zignago, K.)
Case 2:17-cv-01311-TLN-CKD Document 32 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
YONNIE JACKSON,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-01311-TLN-CKD
v.
ORDER
JOSE MARTINEZ,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner Yonnie Jackson (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an
17
18
application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to
19
a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On January 6, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 31.)
23
Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
24
25
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
26
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
27
///
28
///
1
Case 2:17-cv-01311-TLN-CKD Document 32 Filed 02/16/21 Page 2 of 2
1
Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be
2
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 6, 2021 (ECF No. 31), are
5
ADOPTED IN FULL; and
6
2. Petitioner’s motion for immediate release (ECF No. 28) is DENIED.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated: February 15, 2021
9
10
11
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?