Khouanmany v. United States Marshals et al

Filing 49

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/14/2018 ORDERING the Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and plaintiff's 46 motion to produce documents on (a) the Custodian of Records for the Eastern District of CA, U.S. Marshals Service and (b) the Custodian of Records for the Sheriff of Sacramento County. Within 14 days, each Custodian of Records shall respond to plaintiff's motion to produce documents. Alternatively, they may produce the requested documents and provi de the notice of the court of the same. Plaintiff's 47 request for an extension is GRANTED to the extent that she will have 90 days to file her amended complaint. Plaintiff's 48 request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:17-cv-1326-TLN-EFB P

v.

ORDER

UNITED STATES MARSHALS, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with claims premised under Bivens v. Six

18

Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). She has filed a motion for an order requiring the

19

Custodian of Records for the Eastern District of California, U.S. Marshals Service, and the

20

Custodian of Records for the Sheriff of Sacramento County to produce documents in response to

21

a subpoena duces tecum personally served upon each of them on February 27, 2018. ECF Nos.

22

44 & 45. She also seeks an extension of time to file an amended complaint and an order

23

appointing her counsel. As discussed below, the court orders each Custodian of Records to file a

24

response to plaintiff’s motion to produce documents. In addition, plaintiff’s request for an

25

extension of time is granted and the motion for appointment of counsel is denied without

26

prejudice.

27

/////

28

/////

1

I.

2

Subpoena Duces Tecum
On February 27, 2018, the U.S. Marshal personally served a subpoena duces tecum upon

3

each Custodian of Records. ECF Nos. 44 & 45. The subpoena directed each Custodian of

4

Records to produce certain documents that may assist plaintiff in identifying the unnamed

5

employees of the U.S. Marshals Service who plaintiff intends to name as defendants. See ECF

6

No. 42. The subpoena required that the requested documents be produced by March 28, 2018.

7

Id. The time for responding has passed and no objections have been filed. According to

8

plaintiff, the subpoena has been ignored. ECF No. 46. Accordingly, each Custodian of Records

9

is directed to respond to plaintiff’s motion to produce documents. Alternatively, they may

10

produce the requested documents and provide notice to the court of the same. Should a Custodian

11

of Records fail to comply with this order, he or she will be directed to personally appear before

12

this Court and show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(g).

13

II.

14

Request for Extension of Time
Plaintiff requests an extension of time to file an amended complaint pending resolution of

15

her motion to produce documents. ECF No. 47. Plaintiff’s request is granted to the extent that

16

she will have another 90 days from the date this order is filed to file her amended complaint.

17

III.

18

Request for Appointment of Counsel
Plaintiff requests that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require

19

counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist.

20

Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request an attorney

21

to voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935

22

F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990).

23

When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must consider the

24

likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate her claims pro

25

se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970

26

(9th Cir. 2009). Having considered those factors, the court finds there are no exceptional

27

circumstances in this case.

28

/////
2

1

IV.

Order

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

3

1. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order and plaintiff’s motion to

4

produce documents (ECF No. 46) on (a) the Custodian of Records for the Eastern

5

District of California, U.S. Marshals Service, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California,

6

95814, and (b) the Custodian of Records for the Sheriff of Sacramento County, 651 I

7

Street, Sacramento, California, 95814.

8
9
10

2. Within fourteen days of the date of this order, each Custodian of Records shall
respond to plaintiff’s motion to produce documents (ECF No. 46). Alternatively, they
may produce the requested documents and provide notice to the court of the same.

11

3. Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time (ECF No. 47) is granted to the extent that

12

she will have 90 days from the date of this order to file her amended complaint.

13
14
15

4. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 48) is denied without
prejudice.
DATED: May 14, 2018.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3