Canada v. CDCR, et al.
Filing
17
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/24/18 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court assign a District Judge to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RONALD LEE CANADA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
v.
No. 2:17-cv-1329 CKD P
ORDER AND
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.
17
18
On March 13, 2018, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an
19
amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not
20
filed an amended complaint.
21
22
23
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district
court judge to this case.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
25
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
26
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after
27
being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with
28
the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
1
1
Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time
2
waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.
3
1991).
4
Dated: April 24, 2018
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
cana1329.fta
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?