Overton v. CMF Warden et al
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/01/17 ordering within 21 days of service of this order, plaintiff must submit an application in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL L. OVERTON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
No. 2:17-cv-1335 AC P
ORDER
CMF WARDEN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983 and has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned magistrate judge for all
19
purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 305(a). ECF No. 3. By order filed July
20
20, 2017, plaintiff was ordered to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the
21
$400.00 filing fee within thirty days. ECF No. 5. Thirty days have now passed and plaintiff has
22
not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, paid the filing fee, or otherwise responded
23
to the order.1 Plaintiff shall be given one more chance to comply with the court’s July 20, 2017
24
order. Failure to do so will result in this case being dismissed without further warning.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1. Within twenty-one days of service of this order, plaintiff must submit an application in
27
28
1
Although the Clerk of the Court has filed two letters from plaintiff since the order was issued, it
appears that the letters were sent prior to plaintiff’s receipt of the order. See ECF Nos. 6, 7.
1
1
2
3
4
5
support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee.
2. Failure to comply with this order will result in the case being dismissed without further
warning.
SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 1, 2017
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?