Overton v. CMF Warden et al

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/01/17 ordering within 21 days of service of this order, plaintiff must submit an application in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL L. OVERTON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:17-cv-1335 AC P ORDER CMF WARDEN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983 and has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned magistrate judge for all 19 purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 305(a). ECF No. 3. By order filed July 20 20, 2017, plaintiff was ordered to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the 21 $400.00 filing fee within thirty days. ECF No. 5. Thirty days have now passed and plaintiff has 22 not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, paid the filing fee, or otherwise responded 23 to the order.1 Plaintiff shall be given one more chance to comply with the court’s July 20, 2017 24 order. Failure to do so will result in this case being dismissed without further warning. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. Within twenty-one days of service of this order, plaintiff must submit an application in 27 28 1 Although the Clerk of the Court has filed two letters from plaintiff since the order was issued, it appears that the letters were sent prior to plaintiff’s receipt of the order. See ECF Nos. 6, 7. 1 1 2 3 4 5 support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. 2. Failure to comply with this order will result in the case being dismissed without further warning. SO ORDERED. DATED: September 1, 2017 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?