Hardin v. Baughman et al

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/28/18 DISMISSING named defendants Baughman and Gonzalez without prejudice. This action shall proceed on Plaintiff's remaining claims. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEON HARDIN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-1340 MCE AC P v. ORDER D. BAUGHMAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 25, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (140) days. ECF No.14. Plaintiff 23 has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 25, 2018, (14) are ADOPTED in full; 27 28 //// 1 1 2 2. Formerly named defendants Baughman and Gonzalez are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice; and 3 3. This action shall proceed on Plaintiff’s remaining claims. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: November 28, 2018 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?