Hardin v. Baughman et al

Filing 41

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/22/2021 GRANTING 39 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff may file objections to 36 Findings and Recommendations within 21 days of the service of this order. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 LEON HARDIN, 11 12 13 No. 2:17-cv-1340 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER D. BAUGHMAN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion for an extension of time. 17 ECF No. 39. The motion does not identify the deadline plaintiff wishes to extend or how much 18 additional time he seeks. Presumably, he is seeking to extend his deadline to object to the May 19 27, 2021 findings and recommendations, as there are no other pending deadlines. Good cause 20 appearing, the motion will be granted. Plaintiff is advised that if he seeks any further extensions 21 of time, he should identify the deadline he wants to extend and state how much additional time he 22 would like. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time, 24 ECF No. 39, is GRANTED. Within twenty-one days of the service of this order, plaintiff may 25 file objections to the May 27, 2021 findings and recommendations. 26 DATED: June 22, 2021 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?