Rigsby et al v. Intercare Specialty Risk Insurance Services, Inc. , et al.,

Filing 104

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 3/17/18, ORDERING that all discovery with the exception of expert discovery shall be completed no later than 11/30/18. The deadline for completing depositions by oral examination shall be 11/30/18. The deadline for completing depositions by written questions shall be 11/30/18. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 ROBERT R. RIGGS (SBN 107684) STEPHEN G. PREONAS (SBN 245334) Katzoff & Riggs LLP 1500 Park Avenue, Suite 300 Emeryville, CA 94608 Tel. (510) 597-1990 email: rriggs@katzoffriggs.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs KAREN RIGSBY, Trustee, and DONALD P. STEINMEYER 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 1500 PARK AVENUE, SUITE 300 EMERYVILLE, CA 94608 (510)597-1990 KATZOFF & RIGGS LLP 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 KAREN RIGSBY, Trustee of the MARSH REVOCABLE TRUST OF 2003, and DONALD P. STEINMEYER, an individual, ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) INTERCARE SPECIALITY RISK ) INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ) _________________________________ ) ) and RELATED COUNTERCLAIM ) _________________________________ ) Case No. 2:17-cv-01347-MCE-EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND JOINT REPORT OF THE PARTIES OUTLINING DISCOVERY PLAN 20 On June 30, 2017, the Court entered its Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order herein 21 (the “IPSO”). On November 13, 2017, the Court entered an order adopting the Joint 22 Report of the Parties Outlining Discovery Plan (hereafter, “Discovery Plan”), pursuant to _______________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND JOINT REPORT OF THE PARTIES OUTLINING DISCOVERY PLAN 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Rule 26(f)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties in this action agree and stipulate that good cause exists to modify the IPSO and Discovery Plan as set forth herein. Good cause exists in that: a. The parties made their Initial Disclosures herein pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 on December 13, 2017. b. On January 5, 2018, Plaintiffs propounded requests for production of 7 documents to all defendants. These requests requested production of Defendants’ 8 documents on February 12, 2018. 9 c. Defendant Patriot National, Inc. (“Patriot”) filed for bankruptcy 1500 PARK AVENUE, SUITE 300 EMERYVILLE, CA 94608 (510)597-1990 KATZOFF & RIGGS LLP 10 protection on January 30, 2018, thus effectively staying proceedings herein. A 11 stipulation to sever Patriot and proceed with the balance of the action has been 12 submitted to the Court. 13 d. Defendants ISR Holdings, Inc., also known as Intercare Specialty 14 Risk Insurance Services, Inc. (“ISR”), Phoenix Risk Management, Inc. 15 (“Phoenix”) and Kevin Hamm (“Hamm”) have responded to Plaintiffs’ requests 16 for production of documents by stating that they are unable to complete the 17 production of the requested documents until June, 2018. The parties have met and 18 conferred about this delay. The above defendants continue to represent that they 19 cannot complete their necessary privilege review and production of documents 20 prior to June, 2018. This delay prevents the parties from proceeding with non- 21 expert discovery within the time frames contemplated by the IPSO and the 22 Discovery Plan. _______________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND JOINT REPORT OF THE PARTIES OUTLINING DISCOVERY PLAN 2 1 e. Good cause exists to extend the deadline for completing non-expert 2 discovery that is set out in the IPSO and the Joint Report to November 30, 2018, in 3 view of the above delays. 4 Therefore, the parties stipulate and request the Court to enter an order that the 5 IPSO is modified as follows: 6 On p. 2, lines 17-18, the sentence shall be modified to read as follows: 7 “All discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall be completed no later 8 9 1500 PARK AVENUE, SUITE 300 EMERYVILLE, CA 94608 (510)597-1990 KATZOFF & RIGGS LLP 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 than November 30, 2018.” In all other respects, the IPSO is unchanged. Additionally, the parties stipulate and request the Court to enter an order that the Discovery Plan is be modified as follows: On p. 3, line 21, the deadline for completing depositions by oral examination shall be modified to November 30, 2018. On p. 4, line 5, the deadline for completing depositions by written questions shall be modified to November 30, 2018. In all other respects, the Discovery Plan is unchanged. Dated: March 15, 2018 KATZOFF & RIGGS LLP 18 19 /s Robert R. Riggs By: ______________________________ Robert R. Riggs 20 21 22 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and CrossDefendants KAREN RIGSBY, Trustee of the MARSH REVOCABLE TRUST OF 2003, and DONALD P. _______________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND JOINT REPORT OF THE PARTIES OUTLINING DISCOVERY PLAN 3 1 STEINMEYER Dated: March 15, 2018 2 LAW OFFICES OF PETER DUNN LEMMON 3 /s Peter Dunn Lemmon By: ______________________________ Peter Dunn Lemmon 4 5 Attorneys for Defendant and CrossComplainant ISR HOLDINGS, INC. and Defendant PHOENIX RISK MANAGEMENT, INC. 6 7 8 Dated: March 15, 2018 LAW OFFICE HARPAINTER 9 1500 PARK AVENUE, SUITE 300 EMERYVILLE, CA 94608 (510)597-1990 KATZOFF & RIGGS LLP 10 OF DEWEY V. 11 /s Dewey V. Harpainter ______________________________ Dewey V. Harpainter 12 Attorneys for Defendant KEVIN HAMM By: 13 By the Court: 14 Good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 Dated: March 17, 2018 17 18 19 20 21 22 _______________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND JOINT REPORT OF THE PARTIES OUTLINING DISCOVERY PLAN 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?