Rigsby et al v. Intercare Specialty Risk Insurance Services, Inc. , et al.,

Filing 165

ORDER OF DISMISSAL signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 6/17/19. CASE CLOSED(Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 12 KAREN RIGSBY, Trustee of the MARSH REVOCABLE TRUST OF 2003, et al., Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 vs. INTERCARE SPECIALITY RISK INSURANCE SERVICES, INC, et al., Defendants. ________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:17-cv-01347-MCE-EFB ORDER OF DISMISSAL In accordance with the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) that this case be dismissed, without prejudice. The Court shall, however, retain jurisdiction to enforce the Guaranty of Defendant herein, including reservation of jurisdiction to enter Judgment against Defendant Kevin Hamm in the event of default under the Guaranty, until ____________________________________________________________________ 1 ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 performance in full of the terms of the Promissory Note. 2 IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that in the event of default under the 3 Guaranty, Plaintiffs may bring an ex parte application to enforce the settlement and for 4 entry of Judgment against Defendant Kevin Hamm, which the Court shall hear pursuant 5 to its reservation of jurisdiction herein. Plaintiffs may seek entry of the Stipulation for 6 Entry of Judgment for Money attached as Exhibit “C” in connection with the ex parte 7 application, the form of which is hereby approved by the Court. 8 9 10 11 Subject to the foregoing, inasmuch as the case has now been concluded in its entirety, the Clerk of Court is directed to close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 17, 2019 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ____________________________________________________________________ 2 ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?