Valero Refining Company California v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/22/2017 ORDERING PG&E shall file and serve any motion to dismiss Valero's Complaint by 8/21/2017 and notice any motion to dismiss for hearing on 10/5/2017; Valero shall file and serve any opposition to any motion to dismiss the Complaint by 9/14/2017; PG&E shall file and serve any reply to Valero's opposition by 9/28/2017.(Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
Laurie Edelstein (Bar No. 164466)
Sarah K. Jackel (Bar No. 289227)
STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
One Market Street
Steuart Tower, Suite 1800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 365-6700
Facsimile: (415) 365-6699
ledelstein@steptoe.com
sjackel@steptoe.com
John Cox (Bar No. 197687)
Nathan R. Jaskowiak (Bar No. 248007)
Alexander J. Bukac (Bar No. 305491)
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
450 Pacific Avenue
San Francisco, California 94133
Telephone: (415) 398-6000
Facsimile: (415) 981-0136
Michael Dockterman (admitted pro hac vice)
STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
115 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 3100
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Telephone: (312) 577-1300
Facsimile: (312) 577-1370
mdockterman@steptoe.com
Mikal C. Watts (admitted pro hac vice)
Francisco Guerra IV (admitted pro hac vice )
Mark A. Fassold (admitted pro hac vice)
Watts Guerra, L.L.P.
Four Dominion Drive
Bldg. 3, Suite 100
San Antonio, TX 78257
Telephone: (210) 527-0500
Facsimile: (210) 527-0501
6
7
8
STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
One Market Street, Steuart Tower, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105
9
10
11
Attorneys for Defendant
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Valero Refining Company – California
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
VALERO REFINING COMPANY –
CALIFORNIA, a Delaware corporation,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, a )
California corporation,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
No. 2:17-cv-1350-TLN-EFB
STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
FOR DEFENDANT PACIFIC GAS AND
ELECTRIC COMPANY’S MOTION TO
DISMISS
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
No. 2:17-CV-1350-TLN-EFB
1
Plaintiff Valero Refining Company – California (“Valero”) and defendant Pacific Gas
2
and Electric Company (“PG&E”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby
3
agree and stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, that:
4
1.
5
6
21, 2017 and notice any motion to dismiss for hearing on October 5, 2017;
2.
7
8
STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
One Market Street, Steuart Tower, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105
9
PG&E shall file and serve any motion to dismiss Valero’s Complaint by August
Valero shall file and serve any opposition to any motion to dismiss the Complaint
by September 14, 2017;
3.
PG&E shall file and serve any reply to Valero’s opposition by September 28,
2017.
10
11
Dated: August 21, 2017
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
12
By:
13
14
John Cox
Nathan R. Jaskowiak
Alexander J. Bukac
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
450 Pacific Avenue
San Francisco, California 94133
Telephone: (415) 398-6000
15
16
17
18
Attorneys for Plaintiff Valero Refining
Company – California
19
20
/s/ Alexander Bukac
(as
authorized on August 21, 2017)
Dated: August 21, 2017
STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
21
By:
/s/ Laurie Edelstein
22
Laurie Edelstein
Sarah K. Jackel
STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
One Market Street
Steuart Tower, Suite 1800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 365-6700
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
2
No. 2:17-CV-1350-TLN-EFB
1
Michael Dockterman
STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
115 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 3100
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Telephone: (312) 577-1300
2
3
4
Attorneys for Defendant Pacific Gas and
Electric Company
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
DATED: August 22, 2017
STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
One Market Street, Steuart Tower, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105
9
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
3
No. 2:17-CV-1350-TLN-EFB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?