Ransom v. Sacramento Housing Redeveloping Agency et al
Filing
26
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/12/2018 ADOPTING 25 Findings and Recommendations in full. Defendants' 15 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety, with leave to amend within 30 days of the date of this Order. Defendants' 7 , 8 motions for a more definite statement are DENIED as moot. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CLINTON RANSOM,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-01366-TLN-AC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
SACRAMENTO HOUSING
REDEVELOPING AGENCY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a
United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On December 14, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein,
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 25.) Neither
23
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 14, 2017, are adopted in full;
28
2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 15) is granted;
1
3. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed in its entirety, with leave to amend within 30 days of
1
2
the date of this Order;
4. Defendants’ motions for a more definite statement (ECF Nos. 7 and 8) are denied as
3
4
moot.
5
6
Dated: 2/12/2018
7
8
9
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?