Ransom v. Sacramento Housing Redeveloping Agency et al

Filing 27

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/20/18 ORDERING that plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, within 14 days, why his failure to file an amended complaint should not result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of an amended complaint within this timeframe will serve as cause and will discharge this order. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CLINTON RANSOM,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:17-cv-01366-TLN-AC (PS)

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

SACRAMENTO HOUSING
REDEVELOPING AGENCY, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

On February 13, 2018, this court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend

19

within 30 days. ECF 26. That deadline has now passed, and plaintiff has not filed the anticipated

20

amended complaint. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall show

21

cause, within 14 days, why his failure to file an amended complaint should not result in a

22

recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of an amended

23

complaint within this timeframe will serve as cause and will discharge this order. If plaintiff fails

24

to respond, the court will recommend dismissal of his case pursuant to Local Civil Rule 110.

25

DATED: March 20, 2018

26
27
28