Ransom v. Sacramento Housing Redeveloping Agency et al

Filing 28

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/23/18, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's order. Matter REFERRED to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CLINTON RANSOM,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:17-cv-01366 TLN AC (PS)

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO HOUSING
REDEVELOPING AGENCY, et al.,
Defendants.

17
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the
18
undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On February 13,
19
2018, the court dismissed the complaint, and granted plaintiff 30 days to file an amended
20
complaint. ECF No. 26. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so could lead to a
21
recommendation that the action be dismissed. Plaintiff did not respond. On March 21, 2018 the
22
undersigned issued an order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to
23
prosecute. ECF No. 27. Plaintiff has not respond to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to
24
prosecute this case.
25
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without
26
prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s order. See Fed. R.
27
Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110.
28
1

1

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

2

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days

3

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

4

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

5

Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Failure to file objections within the

6

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

7

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

8

DATED: April 23, 2018

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2