Ransom et al v. Mack et al

Filing 4

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/10/17 ORDERING that plaintiff shall show cause, within 14 days, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filling of a new IFP application and an amended complaint will discharge this order. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLINTON RANSOM, 12 13 No. 2:17-cv-01367 GEB AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER 14 MICHAEL MACK, JR., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On July 10, 2017, this court denied plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis 18 (“IFP”), dismissed his complaint, and instructed plaintiff to file a renewed IFP application and 19 amended complaint within 30 days. ECF 18. That deadline has now passed, and plaintiff has not 20 filed the anticipated application or amended complaint. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 21 ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause, within 14 days, why this case should not be dismissed 22 for failure to prosecute. The filling of a new IFP application and an amended complaint will 23 discharge this order. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this 24 case be dismissed. 25 DATED: August 10, 2017 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?