Ransom et al v. Mack et al
Filing
4
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/10/17 ORDERING that plaintiff shall show cause, within 14 days, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filling of a new IFP application and an amended complaint will discharge this order. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CLINTON RANSOM,
12
13
No. 2:17-cv-01367 GEB AC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
14
MICHAEL MACK, JR., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
On July 10, 2017, this court denied plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis
18
(“IFP”), dismissed his complaint, and instructed plaintiff to file a renewed IFP application and
19
amended complaint within 30 days. ECF 18. That deadline has now passed, and plaintiff has not
20
filed the anticipated application or amended complaint. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
21
ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause, within 14 days, why this case should not be dismissed
22
for failure to prosecute. The filling of a new IFP application and an amended complaint will
23
discharge this order. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this
24
case be dismissed.
25
DATED: August 10, 2017
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?