Gutterglove, Inc. v. Lasell et al

Filing 19

ORDER granting 18 Motion to Amend the Complaint signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/17/17. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Jacob Song (SBN 265371) KUTAK ROCK LLP 5 Park Plaza, Suite 1500 Irvine, CA 92614 Telephone: (949) 417-0999 Facsimile: (949)-417-5394 Email: Jacob.Song@KutakRock.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 Sara Weilert Gillette, Pro Hac Vice KUTAK ROCK LLP 2300 Main St., Ste. 800 Kansas City, MO 64108-2416 Telephone: (816) 960-0090 Facsimile: (816) 960-0041 Email: Sara.Gillette@KutakRock.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, GUTTERGLOVE, INC. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 GUTTERGLOVE, INC. a California Corporation, 16 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM LASELL, an individual, AMERICAN DIE and ROLLFORMING, INC., a California corporation; and ARTESIAN HOME PRODUCTS dba VALOR GUTTER GUARD, Case No. 2:17-CV-01372-WBS-CKD ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF GUTTERGLOVE, INC.’S CONSENTED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. 22 23 24 NOW on this day, this matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Consented Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. The Court, after considering the Motion and being 25 26 otherwise fully advised in the premises, FINDS: 27 28 K UTAK R OCK LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW IRVINE CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01372-WBS-CKD ORDER GRANTING GUTTERGLOVE, INC.’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended 2 Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint attached to its Motion is 3 deemed filed on the date of this Order, and shall be filed separately on the docket. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: October 17, 2017 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 K UTAK R OCK LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW IRVINE -2CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01372-WBS-CKD ORDER GRANTING GUTTERGLOVE, INC.’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?