Gutterglove, Inc. v. Lasell et al
Filing
19
ORDER granting 18 Motion to Amend the Complaint signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/17/17. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
Jacob Song (SBN 265371)
KUTAK ROCK LLP
5 Park Plaza, Suite 1500
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone: (949) 417-0999
Facsimile: (949)-417-5394
Email:
Jacob.Song@KutakRock.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
Sara Weilert Gillette, Pro Hac Vice
KUTAK ROCK LLP
2300 Main St., Ste. 800
Kansas City, MO 64108-2416
Telephone: (816) 960-0090
Facsimile: (816) 960-0041
Email:
Sara.Gillette@KutakRock.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff, GUTTERGLOVE, INC.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
GUTTERGLOVE, INC. a California
Corporation,
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff,
v.
WILLIAM LASELL, an individual,
AMERICAN DIE and ROLLFORMING,
INC., a California corporation; and
ARTESIAN HOME PRODUCTS dba
VALOR GUTTER GUARD,
Case No. 2:17-CV-01372-WBS-CKD
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
GUTTERGLOVE, INC.’S CONSENTED
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendants.
22
23
24
NOW on this day, this matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Consented Motion for
Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. The Court, after considering the Motion and being
25
26
otherwise fully advised in the premises, FINDS:
27
28
K UTAK R OCK LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
IRVINE
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01372-WBS-CKD
ORDER GRANTING GUTTERGLOVE, INC.’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended
2
Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint attached to its Motion is
3
deemed filed on the date of this Order, and shall be filed separately on the docket.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: October 17, 2017
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
K UTAK R OCK LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
IRVINE
-2CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01372-WBS-CKD
ORDER GRANTING GUTTERGLOVE, INC.’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?