Perez v. Arnold
Filing
20
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/14/19 ADOPTING 19 Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and DECLINING to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALEX PEREZ,
12
No. 2:17-CV-01379-JAM-CKD
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
ERIC ARNOLD,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On September 13, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
25
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
26
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having
27
reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record
28
and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 13, 2019, are adopted in full;
3
2. The petition is denied;
4
3. The Clerk of Court shall close this action; and
5
4. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. §
6
2253.
7
8
9
10
DATED: November 14, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?