Mina v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
29
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/20/18 AWARDING the Plaintiff attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $4,700.00, which includes $4,300.00 in fees and $400.00 in costs, in settlement of any and all claim he may have in the matter pursuant to EAJA. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
NANCY K. McCOMBS (CSBN 163629)
Law Office of McCombs and Abel
12 Geary Street, Suite 201
San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone: (415) 678-2626
E-mail: abelmccombs@gmail.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
STEPHANIE MINA,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
13
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:17-cv-01381-DB
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE
EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
14
15
Plaintiff, Stephanie Mina, by and through her attorney, Nancy McCombs, and Defendant,
16
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, by and through
17
attorneys, McGregor Scott, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, Jeffrey Chen,
18
Special Assistant United States Attorney, and Deborah Lee Stachel, Regional Chief Counsel, for said
19
district, jointly stipulate that the court award attorney fees and expenses in the amount of four-thousand
20
three-hundred dollars ($4,300.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28, U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs
21
in the amount of four hundred dollars ($400.00) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents
22
compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil
23
action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).
24
25
After the Court issues order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter
of the Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to Nancy McCombs. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S.
1
2
3
4
5
6
586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on
whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s
Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they
are subject to any offset.
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that
Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and
costs to be made directly to Nancy McCombs, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any
7
payments made shall be delivered to Nancy McCombs.
8
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney
9
fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or
10
otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and
11
12
all claims that Plaintiff and Nancy McCombs, including the Law Office of McCombs and Abel have
13
relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.
14
15
16
The parties hereby request that the court enter an order awarding the Plaintiff attorney
fees and expenses in the amount of $4,700.00, which includes $4,300.00 in fees and $400.00 in
costs, in settlement of any and all claim he may have in the matter pursuant to EAJA.
17
18
DATE: 12/4/2018
/s/ Nancy K. McCombs
NANCY K. McCOMBS,
Plaintiff’s Attorney
DATE: 12/4/2018
/s/ Jeffrey Chen
JEFFREY CHEN
Special Assistant Unites States Attorney
McGREGOR SCOTT
United States Attorney for the Eastern
District of California
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
2
3
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 20, 2018
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
DLB:6
DB\orders\orders.soc sec\mina1381.stip.eaja.ord
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?