Mina v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 29

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/20/18 AWARDING the Plaintiff attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $4,700.00, which includes $4,300.00 in fees and $400.00 in costs, in settlement of any and all claim he may have in the matter pursuant to EAJA. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 NANCY K. McCOMBS (CSBN 163629) Law Office of McCombs and Abel 12 Geary Street, Suite 201 San Francisco, California 94108 Telephone: (415) 678-2626 E-mail: abelmccombs@gmail.com Attorney for Plaintiff 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 STEPHANIE MINA, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 13 v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:17-cv-01381-DB STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT 14 15 Plaintiff, Stephanie Mina, by and through her attorney, Nancy McCombs, and Defendant, 16 Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, by and through 17 attorneys, McGregor Scott, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, Jeffrey Chen, 18 Special Assistant United States Attorney, and Deborah Lee Stachel, Regional Chief Counsel, for said 19 district, jointly stipulate that the court award attorney fees and expenses in the amount of four-thousand 20 three-hundred dollars ($4,300.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28, U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs 21 in the amount of four hundred dollars ($400.00) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents 22 compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil 23 action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). 24 25 After the Court issues order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of the Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to Nancy McCombs. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 1 2 3 4 5 6 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Nancy McCombs, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any 7 payments made shall be delivered to Nancy McCombs. 8 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney 9 fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or 10 otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and 11 12 all claims that Plaintiff and Nancy McCombs, including the Law Office of McCombs and Abel have 13 relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. 14 15 16 The parties hereby request that the court enter an order awarding the Plaintiff attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $4,700.00, which includes $4,300.00 in fees and $400.00 in costs, in settlement of any and all claim he may have in the matter pursuant to EAJA. 17 18 DATE: 12/4/2018 /s/ Nancy K. McCombs NANCY K. McCOMBS, Plaintiff’s Attorney DATE: 12/4/2018 /s/ Jeffrey Chen JEFFREY CHEN Special Assistant Unites States Attorney McGREGOR SCOTT United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 20, 2018 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 DLB:6 DB\orders\orders.soc sec\mina1381.stip.eaja.ord

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?