Allen v. Perez

Filing 15

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 09/10/18 ADOPTING 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 11 is DENIED. Plaintiff is directed to pay the filing of $400.00 in full within fourteen days from the date of service of this order. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL DEWAYNE ALLEN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-01384-TLN-EFB v. ORDER R. PEREZ, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 3, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 23 the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 3, 2018, are adopted in full; 27 28 /// 1 1 2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 11) is DENIED; 2 3. Plaintiff is directed to pay the filing of $400.00 in full within fourteen days from the 3 4 5 6 date of service of this order; and 4. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to timely comply will result in dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: September 10, 2018 9 10 11 12 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?