Allen v. Perez
Filing
15
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 09/10/18 ADOPTING 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 11 is DENIED. Plaintiff is directed to pay the filing of $400.00 in full within fourteen days from the date of service of this order. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL DEWAYNE ALLEN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-01384-TLN-EFB
v.
ORDER
R. PEREZ,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
18
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 3, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to
23
the findings and recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 3, 2018, are adopted in full;
27
28
///
1
1
2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 11) is DENIED;
2
3. Plaintiff is directed to pay the filing of $400.00 in full within fourteen days from the
3
4
5
6
date of service of this order; and
4. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to timely comply will result in dismissal of this
action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: September 10, 2018
9
10
11
12
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?