Ransom v. Sa Co. Sheriffs Dept. et al

Filing 7

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/5/2018 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CLINTON RANSOM,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:17-cv-1395 GEB DB PS

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPT., et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

By order signed October 19, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was

19

granted leave to file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No.

20

3.) Plaintiff was granted twenty-eight days from the date of that order to file an amended

21

complaint and was specifically cautioned that the failure to respond to the court’s order in a

22

timely manner would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-eight

23

day period has expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner.

24
25
26

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge

27

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

28

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
1

1

with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections to Magistrate

2

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within

3

the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst,

4

951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

5

Dated: February 5, 2018

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

DLB:6
DB/orders/orders.pro se/ransom1395.fta.f&rs

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2