Hopson v. Rosetti's Market, LLC

Filing 7

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/20/17, ORDERING that the time for defendant Rosetti's Market, LLC to respond to plaintiff's complaint is EXTENDED to 11/15/2017. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 George P. Rodarakis, SBN 222214 Eric J. Sousa, SBN 232541 RODARAKIS & SOUSA, APC 1301 L Street, Suite 4 Modesto, CA 95354 Tel: (209) 554-5232 Fax: (209) 544-1085 Attorneys for Defendant Rosetti's Market, LLC, as an entity and dba Rosetti’s Corner 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 CYNTHIA HOPSON, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 Case No. 2:17-CV-01398-TLN-KJN STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT vs. ROSETTI'S MARKET, LLC, as an entity and dba "Rosetti's Corner", and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. The parties to the above-entitled matter, by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate to an 19 extension of time in which Defendant Rosetti’s Market, LLC, as an entity and dba Rosetti’s Corner, 20 may answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint for a period of twenty-eight days, up to and 21 including November 15, 2017, and respectfully request that the Court enter the attached order. 22 DATED: October 20, 2017 RODARAKIS & SOUSA, APC 23 24 By: 25 26 /s/ George P. Rodarakis George P. Rodarakis Eric J. Sousa Attorneys for Defendant MALAKAUSKAS LAW FIRM 27 28 By: /s/ Daniel Joseph Malakauskas Daniel Joseph Malakauskas Attorneys for Plaintiff 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1 2 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: October 20, 2017 5 6 7 8 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?