Kelley v. Warden

Filing 13

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/14/2017 ORDERING petitioner to show cause, within 30 days, why his failure to oppose respondent's motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and he shall file an opposition. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JERRY LEE KELLEY, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-1401 MCE KJN P v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WARDEN, MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with an application for writ of habeas 18 19 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 9, 2017, respondent filed a motion to dismiss 20 this action as barred by the statute of limitations. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the 21 motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 22 opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 23 the granting of the motion . . . .” Id. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within 24 25 thirty days, why his failure to oppose respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11) should not be 26 deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and he shall file an opposition. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, or to file an opposition 2 to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 3 Dated: November 14, 2017 4 5 6 /kell1401.46hab 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?