Jones v. Senogor et al

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/28/2020 ADOPTING 13 Findings and Recommendations in full. The claims against defendants Senogor, San Joaquin General Hospital, and Baker are DISMISSED without leave to amend. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK A. JONES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-1422 KJM AC P v. ORDER SENOGOR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On May 18, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 21 served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 17. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 26 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 18, 2020 (ECF No. 13), are adopted in 3 4 full; and 2. The claims against defendants Senogor, San Joaquin General Hospital, and Baker are 5 dismissed without leave to amend. 6 DATED: October 28, 2020. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?