Lipsey v. Kalil, et al.
Filing
43
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/13/21 ADOPTING in full 41 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 38 defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Defendants shall file an answer to the amended complaint within 21 days ofthe electronic filing of this order. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR.,
12
No. 2:17-cv-01429-TLN-AC
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
M. KALIL, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff Christopher Lipsey, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed
18
this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United
19
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On March 10, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 41.)
23
Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards and finds the findings
25
and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
28
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 10, 2021 (ECF No. 41), are
ADOPTED IN FULL;
1
1
2
2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 38) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED
IN PART as follows:
3
a. GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief, and
4
b. DENIED in all other respects.
5
3. Defendants shall file an answer to the amended complaint within twenty-one days of
6
the electronic filing of this order.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
DATED: April 13, 2021
9
10
11
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?