James v. Price et al

Filing 34

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/24/18: The findings and recommendations 31 are ADOPTED IN FULL. All Defendants other than Defendant Austin, and all claims other than Claim III in Plaintiff's amended complaint are DISMISSED. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANNIE JAMES, 12 No. 2:17-cv-1433 MCE CKD P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 J. PRICE, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On July 9, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 31. Neither party 23 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having 27 reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record 28 and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 9, 2018, ECF No. 31, are ADOPTED IN 3 4 5 6 7 FULL; and 2. All Defendants other than Defendant Austin, and all claims other than Claim III in Plaintiff’s amended complaint are DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 24, 2018 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?