Lipsey v. Reddy et al
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/26/2017 DENYING without prejudice 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff to complete and return form Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR.,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-1434-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
REDDY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. He has submitted an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but has
19
failed to properly respond to all of the questions asked therein. Specifically, plaintiff failed to
20
provide any details regarding the “gifts or inheritances” noted in his response to question number
21
three. Accordingly, the request (ECF No. 2) is denied without prejudice to filing a properly
22
completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the court is directed
23
to send to plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and plaintiff shall
24
complete and return the form within thirty (30) days. Failure to comply with this order may result
25
in dismissal of this action.
26
So ordered.
27
28
DATED: July 26, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?