Lipsey v. Reddy et al

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/26/2017 DENYING without prejudice 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff to complete and return form Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR., 12 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-1434-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER REDDY, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. He has submitted an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but has 19 failed to properly respond to all of the questions asked therein. Specifically, plaintiff failed to 20 provide any details regarding the “gifts or inheritances” noted in his response to question number 21 three. Accordingly, the request (ECF No. 2) is denied without prejudice to filing a properly 22 completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the court is directed 23 to send to plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and plaintiff shall 24 complete and return the form within thirty (30) days. Failure to comply with this order may result 25 in dismissal of this action. 26 So ordered. 27 28 DATED: July 26, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?