Ransom v. Sacramento Veteran Resource Center et al

Filing 5

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/12/2017 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's order. Objections due within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.(Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLINTON RANSOM, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:17-cv-01443 MCE AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO VETERAN RESOURCE CENTER, et al., Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the 19 undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On July 14, 2017, the 20 court dismissed the complaint, and granted plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint. ECF 21 No. 3. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so could lead to a recommendation that the action 22 be dismissed. Plaintiff did not respond. On August 17, 2017 the court issued an order to show 23 cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff has not 24 respond to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to prosecute this case. 25 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without 26 prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s order. See Fed. R. 27 Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 28 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 1 1 assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one 2 (21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 3 objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 4 Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 5 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 6 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 7 DATED: September 12, 2017 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?