Ryan v. City Of Roseville, et al
Filing
72
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/2/2019 ORDERING that Defendant Pacific Street, LLC identified in 42 Second Amended Complaint shall be deemed to be 110 Pacific Street, LLC and that the Court issue a new Summons naming 110 Pacific Street, LLC as Defendant. 110 Pacific Street, LLC added. Pacific Street, LLC terminated. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
BROOMELL LAW FIRM
DOUGLAS P. BROOMELL (State Bar No.: 179188)
108 MAIN STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Tel: (916) 899-1716
email: broomell@surewest.net
Attorney for Plaintiff
RICHARD J. RYAN
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
RICHARD J. RYAN,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Case No.: 2:17-CV-01453-MCE-DB
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a municipal
corporation; ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a
non-profit public benefit corporation;
UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT
FOUNDATION, a foreign corporation;
CHRIS ROBLES, an individual; PACIFIC
STREET LLC, a California Limited
Liability Company, and DOES 1 through
100, inclusive,
Defendants.
___________________________________/
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
ORDER TO CORRECT DEFENDANT
NAME AND REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE
FOR AMENDED SUMMONS
1
ORDER
2
3
4
5
Upon consideration of the Parties’ Joint Stipulation (ECF No. 71) and good cause
appearing, the Court orders that Defendant Pacific Street LLC, identified in the Second
Amended Complaint (ECF No. 42), shall be amended to read 110 Pacific Street LLC; that
6
wherever Pacific Street LLC is identified in the Second Amended Complaint, it shall be deemed
7
to be 110 Pacific Street LLC; and that the Court issue a new Summons naming 110 Pacific
8
Street, LLC, a California limited liability company, as a Defendant in place and stead of Pacific
9
10
Street, LLC.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated: April 2, 2019
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?