Mackinnon v. Hof's Hut Restaurants, Inc.
Filing
9
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/7/2017 ORDERING Defendant Hof's Hut Restaurants, Inc. to respond to the 1 Complaint by 9/22/2017. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Joshua Briones (SBN 205293)
jbriones@mintz.com
Nicole Ozeran (SBN 302321) (application for admission to be filed)
nvozeran@mintz.com
MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO P.C.
Century Plaza Towers 2029 Century Park East Suite 1370
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: 310-586-3200
Facsimile: 310-586-3202
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HOF’S HUT RESTAURANTS, INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
Case No. 2:17-cv-01456-JAM-DB
STEVE MACKINNON, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
ORDER GRANTING
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO RESPOND TO INITIAL
COMPLAINT
vs.
HOF’S HUT RESTAURANTS, INC., a
California corporation,
17
Defendant.
Judge: John A. Mendez
Complaint Filed: July 13, 2017
Complaint Served: July 21, 2017
Current Response Date: Sept. 8, 2017
New Response Date: Sept. 22, 2017
18
19
The Court has considered the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Defendant Hof’s
20
Hut Restaurants, Inc.’s Time to Respond to Plaintiff Steve Mackinnon’s Complaint.
21
The Court is of the opinion the requested extension should be GRANTED, and it is
22
therefore,
23
///
24
///
25
26
///
///
27
28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
1
2
3
ORDERED, that Defendant Hof’s Hut Restaurants, Inc. has up to and through
September 22, 2017 to a respond to Plaintiff Steve Mackinnon’s Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: September 7, 2017
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
6
7
8
/s/ John A. Mendez___________
71713011v.1
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?