Romac v. Garfield Beach CVS, LLC, et al

Filing 8

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 09/14/17 ORDERING that the due date for Defendant's response to the Initial Complaint is EXTENDED to 09/22/17. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO 9 10 11 SUSAN ROMAC, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 GARFIELD BEACH CVS, LLC dba 15 CVS PHARMACY STORE 9158 and ECC OROVILLE CA, LLC, 16 Defendant. 17 18 CASE NO. 2:17-cv-01464-KJM-CMK ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT GARFIELD BEACH CVS, LLC dba CVS PHARMACY STORE 9158 TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Complaint filed: 7/13/2017 Complaint served: 7/21/ 2017 Trial Date: None Set Judge: Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller 19 20 Plaintiff SUSAN ROMAC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant GARFIELD BEACH 21 CVS, LLC dba CVS PHARMACY STORE 9158 (“Defendant”), by and through 22 their respective undersigned counsel of record, have submitted a joint stipulation to 23 extend the time for Defendant to respond to the Initial Complaint in this matter by 24 14 days so that Defendant’s response to the Initial Complaint will be due on or 25 before September 22, 2017. 26 ///// 27 ///// LEWI S BRISBOI S BISGAAR 28 Case No. 2:17-cv-01464-KJM-CMK [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE INITIAL COMPLAINT 4838-8316-6543.1 1 NOW, THEREFORE, good cause appearing from the parties’ joint 2 stipulation, the Court orders that the time upon which Defendant shall have to 3 respond to the Initial Complaint is hereby extended to September 22, 2017. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED: September 14, 2017. 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWI S BRISBOI S BISGAAR 28 2 Case No. 2:17-cv-01464-KJM-CMK [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE INITIAL COMPLAINT 4838-8316-6543.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?