Romac v. Garfield Beach CVS, LLC, et al
Filing
8
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 09/14/17 ORDERING that the due date for Defendant's response to the Initial Complaint is EXTENDED to 09/22/17. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
9
10
11 SUSAN ROMAC,
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14 GARFIELD BEACH CVS, LLC dba
15 CVS PHARMACY STORE 9158 and
ECC OROVILLE CA, LLC,
16
Defendant.
17
18
CASE NO. 2:17-cv-01464-KJM-CMK
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANT GARFIELD
BEACH CVS, LLC dba CVS
PHARMACY STORE 9158 TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Complaint filed: 7/13/2017
Complaint served: 7/21/ 2017
Trial Date:
None Set
Judge:
Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller
19
20
Plaintiff SUSAN ROMAC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant GARFIELD BEACH
21 CVS, LLC dba CVS PHARMACY STORE 9158 (“Defendant”), by and through
22 their respective undersigned counsel of record, have submitted a joint stipulation to
23 extend the time for Defendant to respond to the Initial Complaint in this matter by
24 14 days so that Defendant’s response to the Initial Complaint will be due on or
25 before September 22, 2017.
26 /////
27 /////
LEWI
S
BRISBOI
S
BISGAAR
28
Case No. 2:17-cv-01464-KJM-CMK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
THE INITIAL COMPLAINT
4838-8316-6543.1
1
NOW, THEREFORE, good cause appearing from the parties’ joint
2 stipulation, the Court orders that the time upon which Defendant shall have to
3 respond to the Initial Complaint is hereby extended to September 22, 2017.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 DATED: September 14, 2017.
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
LEWI
S
BRISBOI
S
BISGAAR
28
2
Case No. 2:17-cv-01464-KJM-CMK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
THE INITIAL COMPLAINT
4838-8316-6543.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?