Frizzell v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 37

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/24/19 AWARDING attorney's fees in the amount of $8,700. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT, CSBN 280890 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8985 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: Michael.Marriott@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant ROBERT WEEMS Weems Law Offices 769 Center Blvd., PMB 38 Fairfax, CA 94930 Telephone: (415)881-7653 Facsimile: (866)610-1430 Email: rcweems@weemslawoffices.com Attorney for Plaintiff 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 17 18 19 RODNEY KEITH FRIZZELL, Plaintiff, 20 21 22 v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 23 24 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 25 26 27 28 1 Civil No. 2:17-cv-01472-AC STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned 2 counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Rodney Keith Frizzell be awarded attorney 3 fees in the amount of Eight Thousand, Seven Hundred Dollars ($8,700) under the Equal 4 Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for 5 all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, 6 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). 7 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Rodney Keith Frizzell, the government 8 will consider the matter of Rodney Keith Frizzell’s assignment of EAJA fees to Robert 9 Weems. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability to honor the 10 assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United 11 States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, 12 the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. 13 Fees shall be made payable to Rodney Keith Frizzell, but if the Department of the 14 Treasury determines that Rodney Keith Frizzell does not owe a federal debt, then the 15 government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Robert 16 Weems, pursuant to the assignment executed by Rodney Keith Frizzell. Any payments made 17 shall be delivered to Robert Weems. 18 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Rodney Keith Frizzell’s request 19 for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of 20 Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a 21 complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Rodney Keith Frizzell and/or Robert 22 Weems including Weems Law Offices may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection 23 with this action. 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Robert Weems and/or Weems Law 2 Offices to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the 3 savings clause provisions of the EAJA. 4 5 Respectfully submitted, 6 Dated: April 19, 2019 WEEMS LAW OFFICES 7 By: 8 9 10 11 Dated: April 19, 2019 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney 12 13 By: 14 15 /s/ Robert Weems* ROBERT WEEMS * By email authorization on April 19, 2019 Attorney for Plaintiff. /s/ Michael K. Marriott MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 16 17 18 19 Of Counsel Jeffrey Chen Assistant Regional Counsel Social Security Administration 20 21 22 ORDER 23 24 25 26 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: DATED: April 24, 2019 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?