Rodriguez v. Sampson

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/13/17, ORDERING that Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. If plaintiff fails to timely comply with this order, the undersigned may recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE DEJESUS RODRIGUEZ, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-1479 GEB AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOYCE SAMPSON, Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff is proceeding in this case in pro per. The proceeding has accordingly been referred to the magistrate by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has requested a 30-day extension of time to file his first amended complaint. 20 ECF No. 4. Plaintiff indicates he “is in an infirmity in a local jail…without access to his notes 21 [and] law library and [is] unable to proceed.” Id. 22 For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. 24 2. If plaintiff fails to timely comply with this order, the undersigned may recommend 25 26 27 28 that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. DATED: September 13, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?