Rogers v. Williams
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/24/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 2 is GRANTED. Service on the named defendant is appropriate. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith, and the USM is directed to serve within ninety days of the date of this order, all process pursuant to FRCP 4. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff one USM-285 form for the named defendant, one summons, a copy of the complaint, an appropriate form for consent to trial by a Magistrate Judge, and this Court's status order. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KIM EDWARD ROGERS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
No. 2:17-cv-01490 JAM GGH
ORDER
JAMES L. WILLIAMS,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff, proceeding in this action pro se, has requested leave to proceed in forma
18
pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. The court has examined the informa pauperis
19
application and has determined that plaintiff lacks the resources to pay the fees and costs
20
associated with this action and will therefore grant the Motion. The court has also determined
21
that the Complaint filed facially states a claim under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents etc., 403
22
U.S. 388 (1971), or in the alternative, 42 U.S.C. section 1983, and will therefore direct service of
23
the Complaint on the named defendant.
24
As a result of the foregoing it IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED;
26
2.
Service on the named defendant is appropriate;
27
3.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith, and the U.S. Marshal is
28
directed to serve within ninety days of the date of this order, all process pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
1
1
P. 4, including a copy of this court’s status order, without prepayment of costs;
2
4.
The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form for the named
3
defendant, one summons, a copy of the complaint, an appropriate form for consent to trial by a
4
magistrate judge, and this court’s status order;
5
5.
Plaintiff is directed to supply the U.S. Marshal, within 14 days from the date this
6
order is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process, and shall file a
7
statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal.
8
The court anticipates that, to effect service, the U.S. Marshal will require at least:
9
a.
One completed summons for the defendant;
10
b.
One completed USM-285 form for the defendant;
11
c.
One copy of the endorsed filed complaint for the defendant, with an extra
12
copy for the U.S. Marshal;
13
d.
One copy of this court’s status order for the defendant; and
14
e.
One copy of the instant order for the defendant.
15
6.
In the event the U.S. Marshal is unable, for any reason whatsoever, to effectuate
16
service on any defendant within 90 days from the date of this order, the Marshal is directed to
17
report that fact, and the reasons for it, to the undersigned.
18
7.
If the defendant waives service, he is required to return the signed waiver to the
19
United States Marshal. If the Marshal has already attempted personal service, the filing of an
20
answer or a responsive motion will not relieve a defendant from the potential obligation to pay
21
the costs of service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d)(2).
22
8.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S.
23
Marshal, 501 “I” Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, Tel. No. (916) 930-2030.
24
////
25
////
26
////
27
////
28
////
2
1
9.
Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that
2
this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rules 110
3
and 183(a).
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 24, 2017
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?