Rogers v. Williams

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/24/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 2 is GRANTED. Service on the named defendant is appropriate. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith, and the USM is directed to serve within ninety days of the date of this order, all process pursuant to FRCP 4. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff one USM-285 form for the named defendant, one summons, a copy of the complaint, an appropriate form for consent to trial by a Magistrate Judge, and this Court's status order. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIM EDWARD ROGERS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:17-cv-01490 JAM GGH ORDER JAMES L. WILLIAMS, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding in this action pro se, has requested leave to proceed in forma 18 pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. The court has examined the informa pauperis 19 application and has determined that plaintiff lacks the resources to pay the fees and costs 20 associated with this action and will therefore grant the Motion. The court has also determined 21 that the Complaint filed facially states a claim under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents etc., 403 22 U.S. 388 (1971), or in the alternative, 42 U.S.C. section 1983, and will therefore direct service of 23 the Complaint on the named defendant. 24 As a result of the foregoing it IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED; 26 2. Service on the named defendant is appropriate; 27 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith, and the U.S. Marshal is 28 directed to serve within ninety days of the date of this order, all process pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 1 1 P. 4, including a copy of this court’s status order, without prepayment of costs; 2 4. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form for the named 3 defendant, one summons, a copy of the complaint, an appropriate form for consent to trial by a 4 magistrate judge, and this court’s status order; 5 5. Plaintiff is directed to supply the U.S. Marshal, within 14 days from the date this 6 order is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process, and shall file a 7 statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. 8 The court anticipates that, to effect service, the U.S. Marshal will require at least: 9 a. One completed summons for the defendant; 10 b. One completed USM-285 form for the defendant; 11 c. One copy of the endorsed filed complaint for the defendant, with an extra 12 copy for the U.S. Marshal; 13 d. One copy of this court’s status order for the defendant; and 14 e. One copy of the instant order for the defendant. 15 6. In the event the U.S. Marshal is unable, for any reason whatsoever, to effectuate 16 service on any defendant within 90 days from the date of this order, the Marshal is directed to 17 report that fact, and the reasons for it, to the undersigned. 18 7. If the defendant waives service, he is required to return the signed waiver to the 19 United States Marshal. If the Marshal has already attempted personal service, the filing of an 20 answer or a responsive motion will not relieve a defendant from the potential obligation to pay 21 the costs of service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d)(2). 22 8. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. 23 Marshal, 501 “I” Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, Tel. No. (916) 930-2030. 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 2 1 9. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that 2 this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rules 110 3 and 183(a). 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 24, 2017 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?