Tramontana v. Paik et al
Filing
12
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/25/2018 ADOPTING in Full 10 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; and Plaintiff shall pay the filing fees in full within 30 days of the date of this order or face dismissal of the action under EDCA Local Rule 110. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TERRENCE TRAMONTANA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-CV-1506-KJM-DMC-P
v.
ORDER
S. PAIK, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by
19
Eastern District of California local rules.
On August 8, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations,
20
21
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections
22
within the time therein specified. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been
23
filed.
24
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United
25
States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
26
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
27
1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be
28
supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed August 8, 2018, are adopted in
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied;
3.
Plaintiff shall pay the filing fees in full within 30 days of the date of this
3
full;
4
5
6
and
7
order or face dismissal of the action under Eastern District of California Local Rule 110.
8
DATED: September 25, 2018.
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?