Putney v. Fox et al

Filing 20

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/30/2017 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS EARL PUTNEY, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-1507 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WARDEN ROBERT FOX, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On September 14, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed for failure to 20 state a claim. Leave to amend was granted, and an amended pleading was due on or before 21 October 14, 2017. That date has now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or 22 otherwise responded to the court’s order. 23 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections 1 1 to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 2 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 3 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 Dated: October 30, 2017 5 6 7 8 9 10 /DLB7; DB/Inbox/Substantive/putn1507.fta 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?