Alvarez v. Ryan

Filing 20

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/12/2017 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Objections due within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. (Hunt, G)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BLACKIE FLORINCEO ALVAREZ, SR.,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:17-cv-1516 GEB KJN P

v.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

MARTIN A. RYAN,

15

Defendant.

16
Plaintiff is a former jail inmate, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. By order filed

17
18

August 28, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended

19

complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an

20

amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

21
22

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

23

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

24

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

25

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

26

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

27

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that

28

////
1

1

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

2

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: October 12, 2017

4
5
6

/alva1516.fta

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2