Beltran v. Baker et al
Filing
129
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/23/2023 ORDERING that within 14 days, any party may request that the settlement conference be conducted by a magistrate judge other than the undersigned. (Spichka, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAIME BELTRAN,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-1520 TLN AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
ERIC R. BAKER, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a civil rights action pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By findings and recommendations filed March 13, 2023, the undersigned
19
recommended that defendant Guerra’s motion for summary judgment be denied. ECF No. 125.
20
The findings and recommendations have now been adopted in full (ECF No. 128) and this case is
21
ready to proceed to trial on the claims against defendant Guerra. However, the court has
22
determined that this case would benefit from a settlement conference before pretrial and trial
23
dates are set. Therefore, this case will be scheduled for a settlement conference. Under Local
24
Rule 270(b), because the undersigned is not the trial judge, the undersigned may conduct the
25
settlement conference, “except that, at the time the settlement conference is scheduled or as
26
otherwise ordered by the Court, any party may request that the conference not be conducted by
27
the assigned Magistrate Judge.” The parties will therefore be given an opportunity to request that
28
another magistrate judge conduct the settlement conference.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the service of this
2
order, any party may request that the settlement conference be conducted by a magistrate judge
3
other than the undersigned. If no party requests a different magistrate judge, a settlement
4
conference will be scheduled before the undersigned.
5
DATED: May 23, 2023
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?