Beltran v. Baker et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/30/2019 ORDERING, within 14 days, plaintiff shall complete and return the attached form notifying the court whether he wants to proceed on the screened complaint or whether he wants to file a fir st amended complaint. If plaintiff does not return the attached form, the court will assume that he is choosing to proceed on the complaint as screened and will recommend dismissal without prejudice of the claim that defendants Cross, Tran, Baker, Swett, Smith and Guerra failed to protect him when they failed to prevent an assault by two other inmates. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAIME BELTRAN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-1520 TLN AC P v. ORDER ERIC R. BAKER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed December 4, 2019, plaintiff was given the option of either 19 proceeding immediately against defendants Cross, Tran, Baker, Swett, Smith, and Guerra on his 20 claim for failing to protect him by not intervening while he was being assaulted and delaying their 21 response after the assault ended, or amending the complaint. ECF No. 10 at 8. Plaintiff was 22 advised that proceeding without amending the complaint would constitute a voluntary dismissal 23 without prejudice of his claim that defendants failed to protect him by failing to prevent the 24 assault, and he was given fourteen days to notify the court how he wanted to proceed. Id. 25 Fourteen days have now passed and plaintiff has not notified the court how he would like to 26 proceed. He will be given a final opportunity to tell the court whether he wants to proceed on the 27 complaint as screened or try to amend the complaint. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Within fourteen days of service of this order, plaintiff shall complete and return the 3 attached form notifying the court whether he wants to proceed on the screened complaint or 4 whether he wants to file a first amended complaint. 5 2. If plaintiff does not return the attached form, the court will assume that he is choosing 6 to proceed on the complaint as screened and will recommend dismissal without prejudice of the 7 claim that defendants Cross, Tran, Baker, Swett, Smith and Guerra failed to protect him when 8 they failed to prevent an assault by two other inmates. 9 DATED: December 30, 2019 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JAIME BELTRAN, 9 10 11 No. 2:17-cv-1520 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE ON HOW TO PROCEED ERIC R. BAKER, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 Check one: _____ Plaintiff wants to proceed immediately on his claim that defendants Cross, Tran, Baker, 16 Swett, Smith and Guerra failed to protect him when they witnessed him being attacked by 17 two other inmates, did not act to stop the assault, and delayed in responding after the 18 assault ended without amending the complaint. Plaintiff understands that by going 19 forward without amending the complaint he is voluntarily dismissing without prejudice 20 his claim that defendants Cross, Tran, Baker, Swett, Smith and Guerra failed to protect 21 him when they failed to prevent the assault by two other inmates. 22 23 _____ Plaintiff wants to amend the complaint. 24 25 26 27 DATED:_______________________ Jamie Beltran Plaintiff pro se 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?