Beltran v. Baker et al
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/26/21 DENYING 33 Application for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAIME BELTRAN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-1520 TLN AC P
v.
ORDER
ERIC R. BAKER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
17
18
§ 1983. Counsel Lillian Munoz recently appeared on plaintiff’s behalf, ECF No. 32, and counsel
19
Jarrett Adams has applied for admission to practice pro hac vice under Local Rule 180(b)(2), ECF
20
No. 33. However, the rule provides that “an attorney is not eligible to practice pursuant to (b)(2)
21
if any one or more of the following apply: (i) the attorney resides in California, (ii) the attorney is
22
regularly employed in California, or (iii) the attorney is regularly engaged in professional
23
activities in California.” Local Rule 180(b)(2). Mr. Adams’ application to states that he resides
24
in North Hollywood, California, making him ineligible for admission to practice pro hac vice
25
under Local Rule 180(b)(2).
Mr. Adams is welcome to petition for admission to the bar of this court pursuant to Local
26
27
Rule 180(a). Admission forms are available on the Court’s website.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for admission to practice
2
pro hac vice, ECF No. 33, is DENIED.
3
DATED: April 26, 2021
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?