Beltran v. Baker et al
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/24/21 GRANTING 56 Defendants request for leave to exceed the ten-page limit for their Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTS Defendants request for leave to file a separate Reply to Plaintiffs Response to Defendants Statement of Undisputed Facts. (Plummer, M)
Case 2:17-cv-01520-TLN-AC Document 57 Filed 09/27/21 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
JAIME BELTRAN,
Case No. 2:17-cv-1520 TLN AC P
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER
v.
ERIC R. BAKER, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ request for leave to exceed the ten-
19
page limit for their Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
20
and GRANTS Defendants’ request for leave to file a separate Reply to Plaintiff’s Response to
21
Defendants’ Statement of Undisputed Facts.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 24, 2021
24
25
26
27
28
1
[Proposed] Order (2:17-cv-1520 TLN AC P)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?