Beltran v. Baker et al

Filing 64

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/10/2022 ADOPTING 63 The Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 46 Motion for Summary Judgment; This matter is REFERRED to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceeds. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAIME BELTRAN, 12 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-01520-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER ERIC R. BAKER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 12, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 63.) Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 12, 2021, (ECF No. 63), are adopted in full; 1 1 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, (ECF No. 46), is DENIED. 2 3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 3 proceeds. 4 DATED: January 10, 2022 5 6 7 8 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?