Beltran v. Baker et al

Filing 89

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/26/2022 ORDERING that within 21 days of the service of this order, defendants shall file a response to 86 Motion to Modify the Discovery and Scheduling Order stating whether the request is opposed and if it is opposed, on what grounds. No reply is necessary. (Huang, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JAIME BELTRAN,

12
13
14

No. 2:17-cv-1520 TLN AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

ERIC R. BAKER, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to

18

42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed a motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order. ECF No. 86.

19

However, the motion does not indicate whether plaintiff attempted to obtain a stipulation from

20

defendants or whether defendants oppose the motion.

21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the service of

22

this order, defendants shall file a response to the motion to modify the discovery and scheduling

23

order stating whether the request is opposed and if it is opposed, on what grounds. No reply is

24

necessary.

25

DATED: July 26, 2022

26
27
28