Vasques v. Protection One, Inc.
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/4/2017 ORDERING This matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action. All dates pending before the undersigned are vacated; and Henceforth the caption on documents filed in this action shall be No. 2:17-cv-01524 KJM CKD with no "PS" designation.(Washington, S) Modified on 8/4/2017 (Washington, S).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LAWRENCE J. VASQUES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-01524 KJM CKD
v.
ORDER
PROTECTION ONE INC.,
15
Defendant.
16
This matter was removed to this court on July 21, 2017. At that time, plaintiff was
17
18
proceeding pro se and, therefore, the matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local
19
Rule 302(c)(21). On August 2, 2017, however, attorney Joshua H. Watson filed a notice of
20
appearance as plaintiff’s counsel in this action.
Because the plaintiff is no longer proceeding pro se, Local Rule 302(c)(21) no longer
21
22
applies and, accordingly, the case will be referred back to the assigned District Judge. Therefore,
23
all pretrial motions, other than discovery motions, should now be noticed for hearing before the
24
District Judge assigned to this action. The assigned Magistrate Judge shall continue to perform
25
all duties described in Local Rule 302(c)(1)-(20).
26
/////
27
/////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. This matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action pursuant to
3
Local Rule 302(c)(21);
4
2. All dates pending before the undersigned are vacated; and
5
3. Henceforth the caption on documents filed in this action shall be
6
7
8
No. 2:17-cv-01524 KJM CKD with no “PS” designation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 4, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
2 / vasques1524.refer.back
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?