Jones v. Rite Aid Corporation

Filing 6

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/25/2017 FINDING that this action is related to the actions denominated 2:13-cv-02439 JAM EFB, 2:14-cv-01946 JAM EFB, 2:14-cv-01957 JAM EFB; 2:14-cv-01960 JAM EFB, 2:14-cv-01961 JAM EFB, 2:14-cv-01963 JAM EFB, 2:14-cv-01965 JAM EFB, 1:15-cv-01721 JAM EFB; 1:15-cv-01748 JAM EFB, 1:15-cv-01872 JAM EFB, 1:15-cv-01874 JAM EFB, 2:15-cv-00429 JAM EFB; 2:15-cv-00622 JAM EFB; 2:15-cv-00623 JAM EFB, 2:15-cv-02150 JAM EFB, 2:15-cv-02396 JAM EF B, 2:15-cv-02594 JAM EFB; 2:15-cv-02597 JAM EFB, 2:16-cv-00174 JAM EFB, 2:16-cv-00211 JAM EFB, 2:16-cv-01028 JAM EFB within the meaning of Local Rule 123; REASSIGNING this case to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings; ORDERING that the caption on all documents filed henceforth in this action be denominated 2:17-cv-01527 JAM EFB. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 LARRY JONES, an individual, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) ) RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 ) through 50, inclusive, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:17-CV-01527 MCE-CKD RELATED CASE ORDER Related to Nos.: 2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB 2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB 2:14-CV—01957 JAM-EFB 2:14-CV-01960 JAM-EFB 2:14-CV-01961 JAM-EFB 2:14-CV-01963 JAM-EFB 2:14-CV—01965 JAM-EFB 1:15-CV-01721 JAM-EFB 1:15-CV-01748 JAM-EFB 1:15-CV-01872 JAM-EFB 1:15-CV-01874 JAM-EFB 2:15-CV-00429 JAM-EFB 2:15-CV-00622 JAM-EFB 2:15-CV-00623 JAM-EFB 2:15-CV-02150 JAM-EFB 2:15-CV-02396 JAM-EFB 2:15-CV-02594 JAM-EFB 2:15-CV-02597 JAM-EFB 2:16-CV-00174 JAM-EFB 2:16-CV-00211 JAM-EFB 2:16-CV-01028 JAM-EFB Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these 24 actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal. 25 2005). 26 judge and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial 27 savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for 28 the parties. Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same 1 1 The parties should be aware that relating the cases under 2 Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are 3 assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation 4 of the actions is effected. 5 court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and 6 magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned. 7 Under the regular practice of this IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the District Judge assignment in 8 the action denominated 2:17-CV-00127 MCE-CKD be reassigned to 9 District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. 10 Brennan for all further proceedings. 11 documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as 12 2:17-CV-01527 JAM-EFB. 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 Dated: Henceforth, the caption on July 25, 2017 /s/ John A. Mendez________________ JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?